The Jealousy Policy of BJD: The Case of Muna Khan


---

The Jealousy Policy of BJD: The Case of Muna Khan

The jealousy policy of the BJD (Biju Janata Dal) is not something entirely new. However, it has given rise to unexpected voices, including that of Muna Khan, a once-silent figure. Muna Khan, an actor known for his mute and deaf persona, has recently spoken out in a way that reveals he is not as oblivious as one might think.

His jealousy towards others has led him to express opinions that are hard to take seriously. It is essential for him to understand that his sentiments stem from envy, and such emotions can lead one to make unwise statements. Muna Khan has become a subject of mockery for many, as his attempts to act and gain fame appear to be driven more by the desire for money than genuine talent.

It’s important for those in the industry and the public alike to recognize that Muna Khan's outbursts should not be taken seriously. Instead, they reflect a deeper issue of jealousy and insecurity that he seems to harbor.

In conclusion, while Muna Khan may wish to position himself as a significant voice in the entertainment world, it is clear that he is merely struggling with personal feelings of inadequacy and envy. Rather than being taken seriously, he should focus on understanding his emotions and improving his craft.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who is first NATION or Pandian?why but fall in odisha.

Image
vk pandian dominion on bjp state  Why is Odisha BJP Protecting Pandian?V.K. Pandian, was a powerful bureaucrat in Odisha, has become a controversial figure due to his influence over state affairs. Allegations of misuse of government resources, including using helicopters for personal trips, have raised concerns about his role. Despite these controversies, the Odisha BJP has remained surprisingly silent or even protective, raising questions about their stance.What’s Happening?Pandian, who was Naveen Patnaik’s private secretary, is often seen as wielding significant power. Several allegations have surfaced against him, including controlling administrative decisions and misuse of public funds. However, instead of launching an aggressive campaign against him, as one might expect, the Odisha BJP has not taken any strong action.This has led to speculation. Some believe that there may be behind-the-scenes agreements or political strategies in play, where the BJP avoids directly attack...
Read more

Justice Sold !

Image
State Information Commission, Odisha: Protecting Law-Breakers Instead of Enforcing the RTI Act? On 5th May 2025, State Information Commissioner Sushanta Kumar Mohanty passed an order in Second Appeal Case No. 3/2025. The case exposed a serious breach of the Right to Information Act, yet no action was taken against the concerned Public Information Officer (PIO) or the First Appellate Authority. Surprisingly, the order seems to protect, rather than penalize, the violators. The case involved Jogendra Sahu of Kakatpur Block, Puri District, who had filed an RTI application on 10th September 2024, seeking information from the PIO, Kakatpur Block. When no response was received, he filed a First Appeal on 28th October 2024. Unfortunately, the First Appellate Authority neither heard the appeal nor provided any information. Frustrated, Jogendra approached the State Information Commission, Odisha, filing a Second Appeal on 30th December 2024. The case was heard by Commissioner Sushant...
Read more